TL;DR
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Host cities for the 2026 World Cup are incurring significant expenses, including transportation and security, while FIFA earns billions. The financial imbalance highlights the costs borne by taxpayers.
New Jersey announced plans to charge $105 for round-trip train tickets for World Cup attendees, a move criticized for price gouging amid mounting costs faced by host cities, while FIFA prepares to profit billions from the tournament.
The 2026 World Cup, hosted across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, has seen host cities burdened with high costs for security, transportation, and infrastructure upgrades. Despite initial promises of free public transit, New Jersey’s transit agency announced a $150 fare, later reduced to $105, for fans traveling to MetLife Stadium. FIFA, based in Zurich, is expected to generate approximately $13 billion from ticket sales, sponsorships, and broadcasting rights, while local governments are responsible for millions in expenses, including stadium renovations and security measures.
The financial strain is compounded by FIFA’s contracts, which limit host cities’ ability to recoup costs. Local officials, including New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill, have criticized FIFA for not covering transportation expenses, with Sherrill stating, “FIFA should cover the cost of transporting its fans.” FIFA responded, expressing surprise at the governor’s stance. The tournament’s economic benefits are uncertain, with experts citing the substitution effect—where tourism replaces rather than adds to existing spending—and highlighting the significant costs borne by taxpayers, including federal, state, and local governments. Parking fees at stadiums are also high, with some cities charging up to $125 per vehicle, further adding to the financial burden on fans and municipalities alike.
Why It Matters
This situation underscores the imbalance in the economic model of the World Cup, where FIFA profits massively while host cities and taxpayers shoulder the costs. It raises questions about the true benefits of hosting such events and the fairness of the current arrangements, especially as many cities face mounting expenses and uncertain returns.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
The 2026 World Cup is the first expanded tournament with 48 teams, hosted across multiple North American cities. Past tournaments in Russia and Qatar were held in autocratic states where FIFA exerted more control over infrastructure. The U.S. hosting involves complex negotiations with local governments, many of which are spending hundreds of millions to prepare venues, transportation, and security. Promises of economic boosts have largely been unfulfilled, with studies showing limited or negative impacts on local economies due to substitution effects and high costs.
“FIFA should cover the cost of transporting its fans. If it won’t, we will not be subsidizing World Cup ticket holders on the backs of New Jerseyans who rely on NJ TRANSIT every day.”
— Mikie Sherrill, New Jersey Governor
“We are quite surprised by the NJ governor’s approach on fan transportation.”
— FIFA spokesperson
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It remains unclear how much additional costs host cities will incur as the tournament progresses, and whether FIFA will provide any further financial support. The long-term economic impact on host communities also remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about the true benefits of hosting the World Cup.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
As the tournament approaches in summer 2026, host cities will continue to finalize logistics and costs. Monitoring will focus on whether FIFA adjusts its financial commitments, and on the actual economic impact once the event concludes, including tourism and infrastructure usage.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Why are host cities paying so much for the World Cup?
Host cities are responsible for infrastructure, security, and transportation costs, which are often substantial. FIFA profits from ticket sales, sponsorships, and broadcasting rights, but does not share these revenues with local hosts.
Will FIFA cover transportation costs for fans?
Currently, FIFA has not committed to covering transportation costs. Some host cities have had to implement or plan to implement ticketed transit, which has faced criticism for high prices.
Is hosting the World Cup financially beneficial for cities?
Most studies suggest that the economic benefits are limited or negative due to substitution effects and high costs, meaning cities often spend more than they gain.
How much money does FIFA make from the World Cup?
FIFA is projected to generate around $13 billion from the 2026 tournament through ticket sales, sponsorships, and media rights, with most of the revenue going to FIFA itself.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
