TL;DR
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Bolde published an essay arguing that people who share less of their lives online may show strengths such as enjoying experiences privately and relying less on outside approval. The article cites research on self-disclosure, self-worth and social media use, but the studies do not establish that privacy itself causes those traits. The supplied source text ends partway through its fifth example, so the other three advertised strengths cannot be assessed here.
Bolde published an essay arguing that people who keep more of their lives offline may be better able to enjoy experiences privately, resist the urge to share and rely less on online approval. The article draws on psychology studies to support some of its points, but the research cited does not show that choosing privacy causes those strengths or that they apply to everyone who posts less.
The essay presents eight purported strengths associated with keeping personal experiences off social media. In the supplied text, it develops five: enjoying an experience without an audience, resisting the impulse to disclose, basing self-worth less on outside approval, comparing oneself less often with others, and paying attention to events in person. The source excerpt ends during the fifth point, leaving the final three claims unavailable for review.
To discuss self-disclosure, the article cites Harvard researchers Diana Tamir and Jason Mitchell, reporting that people spend 30 to 40 percent of their speech discussing their own experiences and that self-disclosure activates the brain’s dopamine reward system. It also notes that a later replication attempt produced mixed results. The supplied material does not give the replication’s citation or details, so the strength and scope of that qualification cannot be assessed from this excerpt.
For its claims about self-esteem, Bolde refers to psychologist Jennifer Crocker’s study following more than 600 college freshmen through their first year. The article says students who tied self-worth to external sources reported more stress and anger, more drug and alcohol use, and more symptoms of disordered eating. Crocker’s quoted phrase, “The pursuit of self-esteem is ultimately self-destructive,” came, according to Bolde, from a University of Michigan release about the research. The essay also describes a University of Pennsylvania experiment in which 143 undergraduates limited use of Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat to 10 minutes per platform per day for three weeks; compared with a control group, they reported significantly less loneliness and depression.
How Posting Habits Relate to Well-Being
The topic matters because social media is one place where people share milestones, keep in touch and see others’ lives. Bolde’s essay offers readers a different interpretation of not posting: privacy may reflect personal preference or satisfaction with an experience, rather than secrecy or a lack of activity. That is an interpretation, not a psychological assessment. Posting frequency alone cannot establish someone’s emotional security, self-worth or attention to the people around them.
The studies described raise a narrower point: external approval and time spent on social platforms can relate to reported well-being. The freshmen study concerns where students placed their self-worth; it does not test whether private people are healthier. The social media experiment tested a short-term usage limit among undergraduates, rather than a general preference for privacy. Those distinctions matter for readers deciding how much the evidence supports the essay’s broader list.
Bolde also makes a useful distinction between sharing because a person enjoys it and sharing to obtain reassurance. The source does not offer a way to diagnose that motive from a post or a like count. A reader’s own experience may be a more relevant prompt: whether sharing feels enjoyable, pressured or tied to mood. The article’s claims should be read as possibilities, not a checklist that sorts people into secure and insecure groups.
Studies Behind the Essay’s Claims
The supplied Bolde text opens with the author’s account of a five-day cabin trip in northern Michigan that was not posted to Instagram. A coworker asked about photos after checking the author’s account, prompting the essay’s broader argument that unshared experiences can still feel complete. This is personal testimony and framing, rather than evidence about how people generally behave.
The research cited addresses related but distinct subjects: how much people talk about themselves, the relationship between self-worth and external approval, and reported mood after limiting social media use. Bolde’s description of the University of Pennsylvania experiment names the platforms, daily limits, duration and participant count, and quotes researcher Melissa Hunt as saying, “it’s easy to conclude that everyone else’s life is cooler or better than yours.” The article attributes social comparison as a likely explanation, while acknowledging the study was small and limited to college students.
These studies do not, as presented in the supplied text, compare people who prefer privacy with people who routinely post across a representative population. Nor do they establish that posting less produces stronger attention, greater self-control or more stable self-worth. The essay’s first-person examples and its research references therefore serve different roles: the examples illustrate the author’s argument, while the studies provide evidence about specific behaviors or reported outcomes.
““The pursuit of self-esteem is ultimately self-destructive.””
— Jennifer Crocker, quoted in a University of Michigan release, as cited by Bolde
What the Evidence Cannot Establish
The supplied source excerpt does not include the article’s publication date, the full references for the studies, or the remainder of its eight-point list. It cuts off during the discussion of paying attention to events in person. The final three advertised strengths, and any evidence Bolde gives for them, are therefore unknown from the material provided.
The excerpt also does not establish that people who post less are generally more emotionally secure, or that keeping life private leads to better well-being. The described research concerns self-disclosure, external sources of self-worth and restricted social media use; none of those descriptions directly tests the essay’s central comparison between people who prefer privacy and people who share more. The source itself acknowledges mixed replication results for one self-disclosure finding and limits on the social media study.
It remains unclear how representative the cited participants were, how long any reported effects lasted beyond the stated study periods, and whether the results apply to people outside the studied student groups. The essay also says posting is not automatically approval-seeking, a qualification that limits any conclusion based only on visible activity.
Reading the Claims in Full
No follow-up study, policy action or other next milestone is identified in the supplied material. The immediate next step for readers seeking to evaluate the argument is to consult the complete Bolde article and its linked research sources, particularly because the excerpt provided here stops before the article’s final three points.
Any broader conclusion would require research directly comparing people’s privacy preferences and sharing habits over time, while accounting for factors such as age, platform use and reasons for posting. Until such evidence is presented, the cited studies support narrower observations about self-worth, social comparison and social media use, not a general rule that a private online life signals a particular set of strengths.
Key Questions
What is Bolde’s main claim?
Bolde argues that people who keep more of their lives offline may be able to enjoy experiences without outside reactions, resist sharing impulses and depend less on online approval. These are the essay’s claims, not findings shown to apply to every person who posts less.
Do the cited studies prove that posting less makes people more secure?
No. The studies described address self-disclosure, sources of self-worth and a short-term social media use limit among undergraduates. The supplied material does not show that they tested whether a preference for privacy causes greater emotional security.
What did the social media experiment involve?
As summarized by Bolde, 143 undergraduates limited Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat to 10 minutes per platform per day for three weeks. Compared with a control group, they reported significantly less loneliness and depression. The source says the experiment was small and limited to college students.
Does the supplied source explain all eight strengths?
No. The text provided stops partway through the fifth point, which concerns attention to in-person events. The remaining three points and their supporting material are not included in the supplied excerpt.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
