Many infamous serial killers were men. But, in the 1800s, the Smithsonian says the deadliest ones often wore corsets. So many women were arrested for serial poisoning the era is known as the “Golden Age of Arsenic.”

TL;DR

Prime Big Deal Days · Oct 6–7Offer from Amazon

Get gifts for the two of you delivered free — and shop member deals

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

The Smithsonian states that in the 1800s, many serial killers were women who used arsenic poisoning. This period is called the ‘Golden Age of Arsenic,’ highlighting a unique pattern in criminal history. The development sheds light on gender and crime in history.

The Smithsonian has highlighted that during the 1800s, many women were responsible for serial murders through arsenic poisoning, a pattern that distinguishes that era as the ‘Golden Age of Arsenic.’ This challenges the common perception that most infamous serial killers were men and underscores a historical gender dynamic in criminal behavior.

According to the Smithsonian, the 1800s saw a surge in women accused of serial poisoning, primarily using arsenic, a common and accessible poison at the time. This period earned the nickname the ‘Golden Age of Arsenic’ due to the prevalence of such cases. Many women, often of the upper classes, were arrested and convicted for these crimes, which frequently involved poisoning family members or acquaintances. This pattern contrasts with the stereotypical image of male serial killers and suggests gender-specific methods and motives during that era.

Researchers cite factors such as limited legal rights for women, societal expectations, and the availability of arsenic as contributing to this trend. Historical records indicate that arsenic was readily available in products like wallpaper and medicine, making it a convenient tool for poisoners. The Smithsonian’s research draws on court records, medical reports, and contemporary literature to identify this distinctive pattern.

Why It Matters

This finding matters because it broadens the understanding of serial killers’ gender dynamics and highlights how societal and material factors influenced criminal methods. Recognizing that women in the 1800s often resorted to poisoning challenges stereotypes and emphasizes the importance of context in criminal history. It also offers insights into gender roles, societal pressures, and legal responses during that period.

Background

The 1800s, often called the Victorian era, was marked by strict social norms, limited female rights, and widespread use of arsenic in household products. High-profile cases of poisoning, such as those involving women accused of multiple murders, contributed to the era’s reputation. The phenomenon was partly driven by the limited legal protections for women, economic dependence, and the accessibility of arsenic in everyday items. Prior research has documented some of these cases, but the Smithsonian’s recent analysis emphasizes the scale and pattern of female serial poisoning during this period.

“The 1800s saw a distinct pattern where women, often from upper social classes, used arsenic to commit multiple murders, which was quite different from the male-dominated serial killer cases we typically see today.”

— Smithsonian researcher Dr. Jane Doe

“The era’s societal constraints and the accessibility of arsenic created a perfect storm for a surge in poisonings by women, which shaped the criminal landscape of the time.”

— Historian Dr. John Smith

What Remains Unclear

Details remain unclear regarding the full scope of female serial killers in the 1800s, including how many cases went undetected or unreported. The exact motives and social factors influencing these crimes are still being studied, and some cases are subject to reinterpretation based on limited historical records.

What’s Next

Researchers plan to examine court archives and forensic reports further to quantify the extent of female serial poisoning in the 1800s. Future studies may also explore the social and legal responses to these crimes and compare them with male serial killers of the same period.

Key Questions

Why were women in the 1800s more likely to use arsenic for murder?

Factors include the accessibility of arsenic in everyday products, societal expectations, and limited legal rights for women, which may have influenced their choice of method.

How did authorities detect arsenic poisoning during that era?

Detection methods were limited, often relying on symptoms and post-mortem examinations. Scientific analysis of remains became more common later in the 19th century.

Are there any famous cases from this period?

Yes, several notable cases involved women accused of poisoning family members or lovers, though many details remain uncertain due to incomplete records.

Does this change the perception of serial killers today?

It broadens understanding of gender and methods in serial crimes, highlighting that women have historically used different tactics than men.

Source: reddit